In the event that a party breaches a contract there are several different remedies that may be available depending on the nature and severity of the breach. Some breaches may be so minor as to warrant no action, for example, serving a notice by second class mail when the contract stipulates first class post (unless any loss could be shown that was a direct result of the slower delivery).
Others, however, may be very serious and could cause the contractual relationship to come to an end, or to cost one party a substantial amount in losses. This article explores the remedies for breach of contract: damages, which can either be liquidated or unliquidated, and the various equitable remedies.
Liquidated Damages
In the majority of cases, remedies are by way of damages. Liquidated damages are a sum that is fixed between the parties that becomes payable in the event of a breach of contract. There is however a distinction to be drawn between a genuine estimate of loss and a ‘penalty’, which the court will not enforce. A recent example of this is the recent decision in which bank and credit card charges were deemed to be excessive and not a genuine estimate of loss.

Describe a contract you are about to sign and get a plain English summary of the clauses that could hurt you. Takes about 2 minutes.
Try our Contract Red Flag Checker free, here on this site →Unliquidated Damages
These are damages that are assessed by the court and compensate a losing party for any loss that they suffer for breach of contract. In the event that the party cannot prove actual loss, they will only be entitled to nominal damages. It is important to note that unliquidated damages are not intended to be punitive, but ‘loss’ is broadly defined. Loss can be calculated in three ways:
1) Loss of Bargain: This is designed to put the claimant back in the position they were in before the breach of contract occurred. However, there are numerous factors to consider: whether the damage was too remote to be able to be linked with the defendant; whether the breach of contract actually caused the loss; the type of loss suffered by the claimant; and whether the claimant sufficiently mitigated their loss once there had been a breach of contract.
2) If the claimant incurs expenses as a result of only partial performance of the contract, the defendant will pay Reliance Loss.
3) Restitution occurs when the claimant has granted the defendant with some kind of benefit and wants to claim it back because of the breach of contract. This will only be used in situations in which there has been a total lack of consideration, for example if the claimant has paid for the goods but has not received them.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
Equitable Remedies
These are remedies that are designed to rectify breaches of contract. They are not granted as of right and can only be ordered by a court. However, they are each designed to put the parties into the position they would have been in if the contract had proceeded. There are two main types of equitable remedy: specific performance, and injunctions.
A court may order a party to fulfil their obligations under the contract, otherwise known as ‘specific performance.’ Injunctions also order defendants to behave in a specific way, either by requiring them not to do something (prohibitory injunctions) or to do something (mandatory injunction.) Prior to trial, a court can also order a party to do/not to do something by way of an interlocutory injunction, preserving a position until such time as the issue has been decided by the court. Mandatory injunctions differ from specific performance in that an action required under a mandatory injunction does not need to be something that was a requirement under the performance of the original contract.
I signed an agreement with my employer last year 1 July till the 18 July in the agreement its said "if i wish to leave the company I will have to pay the entire cost back to the company in full". A week before leaving, the flights and whole trip was postponed for a month later. Now the agreement I signed had the above mentioned dates on it and was not updated to the new dates. It's been almost 8 months and there has been no updated on this agreement.
If I were to leave the company, can they still hold me to that agreement?
This was a verbal booking, I have nothing in writing from them, their terms and conditions on their website do not state anything regarding full payment. I have given them 10 days notice of cancellation are they right to say I have to pay in full.
I just want to get back to my original place of employment. I hate all that is happening here.
In June I was dismissed without any warning and policies and procedures were not followed by the company. I was reinstated after 10 days.
Since then I have been relocated at great expense financially and it was mentally traumatic. I have been sitting in my apartment awaiting confirmation of where I would be working. At several meetings I requested to go back to my original workplace. Sitting in temporary accommodation I soon fell into a depression. I have sought medical assistance and was referred to a psychiatrist.
I have never encountered this kind of treatment as an employee and was devastated by what was happening to me. I had requested a meeting with my managers to resolve this matter but they refused to consider giving me the stability and security that I needed, by acting in good faith. I do believe that this is a strategic attempt by managers to get rid of me, permanently, by compiling evidence against me. I lodged a grievance early in July and to date nothing has been done to resolve the matter, either informally or formally. The matter is on hold because senior managers are on holiday till mid August.
I have submitted a letter to say that I am working 'under protest'. I will resign by the end of the week and claim repudiatory dismissal. I do believe that I hav been wrongfully dismissed (acknowledged by employer), they have acted in bad faith and have therefore broken all confidence and trust that I've had for my employer.
What are my options?
Thank you very much
We are devastated as this was not an easy decision to reach in the first place. We think the breeder has had a better offer for the pup and we have been dropped.
Can we force the sale to go ahead as promised or can we sue for breach of contract.
Thanks for your advice in advance.
Ask Contracts and Agreements a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.