Home > Case Studies > Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball: A Case Study

Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball: A Case Study

By: Lorna Elliott LLB (hons), Barrister - Updated: 25 Oct 2012 |
 
Carlill Carbolic Smoke Ball Contract

The case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball is one of the most important cases in English legal history. In essence it defined what it is to create an ‘offer’ in an advertisement, and how a member of the public successfully argued that they had ‘accepted’ the offer and performed under the terms of the advertisement (contract.)

Facts of the Case

The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company advertised in the Pall Mall Gazette in 1891 that their Carbolic Smoke Ball was a cure for flu, bronchitis, coughs, colds, headaches, hay-fever, whooping cough, laryngitis and sore throats amongst others.

It was so confident of the usefulness of the carbolic smoke ball, and its ability not only to cure but also to prevent someone from getting the ‘flu, that it advertised on the following basis: Anyone who used the carbolic smoke ball in a particular way for a specified period of time, but who still caught influenza afterwards, would be entitled to claim £100 from the company.

The advertisement went on to say that the company had gone so far as to deposit £1000 in the Alliance Bank in the event of any such claims. The plaintiff (who nowadays would be called the ‘claimant’) saw the advertisement and decided to buy one of the carbolic smoke balls. She used it exactly as advised, but still caught influenza. She took the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company to court in order to claim her £100. The court found in her favour, but the defendants appealed.

The Defendant’s Case

On appeal, the defendant’s case was that there was no binding contract between the parties. The defendant company had no means of checking the ball, or of establishing whether the plaintiff had in fact used the ball as directed. They also said that the plaintiff had not provided any consideration, and that merely doing an act in private (i.e. following instructions) would not be enough.

They argued, in the alternative, that if the court found there to be a contract, that contract was no more than a ‘wagering contract’ in which liability was purely determined on one issue – whether the plaintiff caught influenza or not - in which case it would be void, or that if it was an insurance policy that it was ‘bad’ because it relied on whether or not there would be an occurrence of an uncertain event. However, the court did not consider that the ‘wager’ or ‘insurance’ arguments were valid.

The Judgment

The plaintiff argued that the advertisement constituted an offer, which could be accepted by anyone who saw it. The court agreed with the plaintiff and dismissed the defendant’s appeal. The advertisement was a promise to pay any person who took up the offer the sum of £100 if they caught the influenza despite having used the smoke ball as directed. The plaintiff provided the consideration required to form part of the contract in their continued use of the carbolic smoke ball.

Usage Today

The effects of this judgment are still felt today. If you lose a family pet and put up a poster offering a reward for its safe return, you are providing an ‘offer’ which someone may accept, if they find your pet safe and well. Similarly, the police offer rewards to ‘anyone’ who can provide information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of a suspect in a criminal investigation. If a member of the public provides that information, and the police are as a result able to arrest/secure a conviction against the wanted person, the reward money will become payable.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
The passage of the court is true.i will do my best to apply it in my business
Albert zakarony - 25-Oct-12 @ 9:16 PM
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Latest Comments
  • confused
    Re: What If I Don't Have a Written Contract With My Employer?
    Hi, I have worked for the NHS for over 5 years doing the same job at the same place as a…
    25 November 2020
  • Bob
    Re: The Law & Verbal Agreements
    Before my mother and father died, myself and my brother were told that my brother was to get the house to live in after their…
    23 November 2020
  • Ajju
    Re: Marriage Contracts
    Any girl who can go to uk January 2021 intake. Marriage or agreement marriage... Call me 9217515985 I'm from india
    15 November 2020
  • Maan
    Re: Marriage Contracts
    Hi Please Can you help me to find a girl in uk who marry with me its permanent.
    15 November 2020
  • adnan
    Re: Marriage Contracts
    Hi can you help me find a woman to marry in uk, I'm 22 years old please help me, thank you
    12 November 2020
  • Kitty54
    Re: How a Landlord Agreement Works
    I have lived in a property for 12 years, in that time the ownership has changed but I never had a new tenancy agreement or any…
    26 October 2020
  • Zero63
    Re: Legally Binding Contracts
    We purchased a property in 2019, our neighbour purchased their property in 2017. 2 months after moving in we were embroiled in a…
    21 October 2020
  • Zero63
    Re: Legally Binding Contracts
    We purchased a property in 2019, our neighbour purchased their property in 2017. 2 months after moving in we were embroiled in a…
    21 October 2020
  • Nemo183
    Re: Title Deeds: Who Keeps Them?
    If the title deeds are owned by a company or other organisation, then the who's name appears?
    15 October 2020
  • Melnew
    Re: Contracts and Self Employment
    I have been asked by a company to join them but on a self employed basis for the first month to see i like it or they like me...…
    24 September 2020