Home > Case Studies > Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball: A Case Study

Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball: A Case Study

By: Lorna Elliott LLB (hons), Barrister - Updated: 25 Oct 2012 |
 
Carlill Carbolic Smoke Ball Contract

The case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball is one of the most important cases in English legal history. In essence it defined what it is to create an ‘offer’ in an advertisement, and how a member of the public successfully argued that they had ‘accepted’ the offer and performed under the terms of the advertisement (contract.)

Facts of the Case

The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company advertised in the Pall Mall Gazette in 1891 that their Carbolic Smoke Ball was a cure for flu, bronchitis, coughs, colds, headaches, hay-fever, whooping cough, laryngitis and sore throats amongst others.

It was so confident of the usefulness of the carbolic smoke ball, and its ability not only to cure but also to prevent someone from getting the ‘flu, that it advertised on the following basis: Anyone who used the carbolic smoke ball in a particular way for a specified period of time, but who still caught influenza afterwards, would be entitled to claim £100 from the company.

The advertisement went on to say that the company had gone so far as to deposit £1000 in the Alliance Bank in the event of any such claims. The plaintiff (who nowadays would be called the ‘claimant’) saw the advertisement and decided to buy one of the carbolic smoke balls. She used it exactly as advised, but still caught influenza. She took the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company to court in order to claim her £100. The court found in her favour, but the defendants appealed.

The Defendant’s Case

On appeal, the defendant’s case was that there was no binding contract between the parties. The defendant company had no means of checking the ball, or of establishing whether the plaintiff had in fact used the ball as directed. They also said that the plaintiff had not provided any consideration, and that merely doing an act in private (i.e. following instructions) would not be enough.

They argued, in the alternative, that if the court found there to be a contract, that contract was no more than a ‘wagering contract’ in which liability was purely determined on one issue – whether the plaintiff caught influenza or not - in which case it would be void, or that if it was an insurance policy that it was ‘bad’ because it relied on whether or not there would be an occurrence of an uncertain event. However, the court did not consider that the ‘wager’ or ‘insurance’ arguments were valid.

The Judgment

The plaintiff argued that the advertisement constituted an offer, which could be accepted by anyone who saw it. The court agreed with the plaintiff and dismissed the defendant’s appeal. The advertisement was a promise to pay any person who took up the offer the sum of £100 if they caught the influenza despite having used the smoke ball as directed. The plaintiff provided the consideration required to form part of the contract in their continued use of the carbolic smoke ball.

Usage Today

The effects of this judgment are still felt today. If you lose a family pet and put up a poster offering a reward for its safe return, you are providing an ‘offer’ which someone may accept, if they find your pet safe and well. Similarly, the police offer rewards to ‘anyone’ who can provide information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of a suspect in a criminal investigation. If a member of the public provides that information, and the police are as a result able to arrest/secure a conviction against the wanted person, the reward money will become payable.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
The passage of the court is true.i will do my best to apply it in my business
Albert zakarony - 25-Oct-12 @ 9:16 PM
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Latest Comments
  • Kumar
    Re: What If I Don't Have a Written Contract With My Employer?
    Hi , I worked for 3 years for previous company( I am sacked now) . They have not given any…
    18 April 2019
  • Nogs
    Re: Contracts and Self Employment
    I am self employed gardener and have been working for the same school for over 12 years 3 days a week. Until they have reduced to…
    4 April 2019
  • Cstead
    Re: Contracts and Self Employment
    I’m self employed beauty therapist should I be responsible for my own insurance & who is responsible for risk assessment me or…
    1 April 2019
  • Mick1980
    Re: Breach of Contract
    ** Late ** in being paid. The QS was either sacked or quit and did not process our December Invoice for £25k.
    30 March 2019
  • Gal
    Re: Title Deeds: Who Keeps Them?
    I have a buyer for my mums house and we cannot find the deeds and it is not reg with the land reg. with have scgedulw of deeds and…
    28 March 2019
  • AlyMak
    Re: Employment Contracts Explained
    I am self employed and have been working for a self employed man that works for a top publishing company. It was agreed in June…
    25 March 2019
  • georgekennedy
    Re: The Law & Verbal Agreements
    My daughter, within the last three weeks has purchased a new motor car on finance. The car was purchased from an Arnold Clark…
    20 March 2019
  • Phil
    Re: Gym Contracts Explained
    Joined a leisure centre in the town I used to work because it was the same chain as another leisure centre in my town and the terms and…
    19 March 2019
  • Phil
    Re: Gym Contracts Explained
    Joined a leisure centre in the town I used to work because it was the same chain as another leisure centre in my town and the terms and…
    18 March 2019
  • Sub
    Re: Giving an Undertaking
    Hi. I hope some one can help me. My wife left with my son one day and took out a non molestation order on an ex parte basis against me. She…
    18 March 2019