Home > Case Studies > Do You Have to Know About a Breach to Be Liable?

Do You Have to Know About a Breach to Be Liable?

By: Lorna Elliott LLB (hons), Barrister - Updated: 30 Aug 2012 |
 
Breach Contract Liable Claim Restrictive

In some circumstances, a party is not liable for breach of contract if they honestly didn’t know that what was happening amounted to a breach of a contract. This means that a ‘mistaken belief’ that something was authorised, when in fact it was not, may amount to a defence to a claim for breach of contract. A case that was heard in the House of Lords in 2007 demonstrates this.

The Case

Two directors and some employees of a property development business (Mainstream) set up a company that was in direct competition with it. The two directors secured funding from a third party, and diverted investment opportunities away from Mainstream and into the newly formed company. The investor asked whether this activity was authorised, but was informed that Mainstream had been offered the opportunities first, but had refused to take them. The court had to consider whether the investor could be liable for inducing a breach of contract.

The Appeals

The case went all the way to the House of Lords, where the decision of the lower courts was upheld. The investor could not be liable for breach of contract. This is because in order to prove liability for breach of contract, you need to show:

  • that the contract has been breached
  • that the person knows that what they are doing amounts to inducing a breach of contract. This is important because turning a blind eye can amount to a breach of contract, but the focus is on what you know rather than what you should know.
  • the breach of contract should have been intended, either as a consequence of the action by the person breaching it or as a breach in itself.

What This Case Means

If a person honestly believes that there is no breach of contract being committed they cannot be liable for it, even if that honest belief was foolish or naïve. In practical terms, an employer can take on an employee who breaches a contract with their previous employer or other employer, and as long as they honestly believed that what the employee was doing did not breach any contracts, they will have a defence.

Implications For Employers

This is of considerable importance to employers hiring new staff who are coming to work for them having previously worked for a competitor or someone in the same industry. Often employment contracts include a ‘restrictive covenant’, which prevents an employee from working within a specific geographical area, or soliciting clients or employees from the previous employer, for a certain period of time.

Some restrictive covenants are unenforceable and constitute a restraint of trade, such as a clause that prevented an employee from working as an estate agent in the whole of the UK for a period of two years after the termination of their employment. If an employee has a restrictive covenant with a previous employer, the new employer will be protected if they had the ‘mistaken belief’ that the employee’s former contract was not being breached.

You might also like...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Latest Comments
  • alfie
    Re: Title Deeds: Who Keeps Them?
    no point posting questions here nobody answers!
    24 January 2020
  • Husein
    Re: Contracts and Self Employment
    I am a self employed and working in Amazon last 6 month as delivery driver through RAM distribution Company.Unexpected called me…
    10 January 2020
  • Husein
    Re: Contracts and Self Employment
    I am a self employed and working in Amazon last 6 month as delivery driver through RAM distribution Company.Unexpected called me…
    10 January 2020
  • Libby
    Re: Title Deeds: Who Keeps Them?
    My grandfather purchased the freehold on 4 properties in Sheffield sometime before 1950. These were inherited by my father and…
    9 January 2020
  • Ma eee
    Re: Engagement Contracts
    Can i sue him for breechbof promise, we dated for 8yrs, i proposed and he accepted, i bought him a ring...Later he proposed and also i…
    9 January 2020
  • Vulnerablemother
    Re: The Law & Verbal Agreements
    Help. First time mum, at the time baby was 5 months old and husband was being made redundant all of which the plumber knew. I…
    7 January 2020
  • Jud
    Re: Changing a Contract
    Hi I've worked for my company for 14 years on nights Sunday to Thursday now they say I've got to do my hours over 7 days with roted days…
    30 December 2019
  • Shikdar
    Re: Marriage Contracts
    I am Mamun Rashid. I have five sisters and no brother. My tow elder sisters are living in UK.. Nowadays i am planing to go uk with a spouse visa.
    10 December 2019
  • Machine1uk
    Re: Contracts for Goods: Your Statutory Rights
    I purchased a vehicle through a finance company from a dealer. I broke down 2 weeks later and contacted the…
    3 December 2019
  • Sam
    Re: What If I Don't Have a Written Contract With My Employer?
    is this still active for questions to be answered?
    28 November 2019